Material Design vs iOS Human Interface: Complete Comparison
Quick Summary
Winner: iOS Human Interface Guidelines for most users building native iOS apps because of its seamless integration with Apple's ecosystem and consistent user experience across Apple devices.
However, if you're developing cross-platform applications or prefer a more flexible design system with extensive documentation, Material Design might be better suited to your needs.
Both design systems serve different purposes, and your choice should depend on your specific platform requirements, target audience, and design preferences.
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Material Design | iOS Human Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Cost to use | Free | Free |
| Design resources | Free | Free |
| Development tools | Free (Android Studio) | Free (Xcode) |
| Design assets | Free | Free |
| Documentation | Free | Free |
Features Comparison
| Feature | Material Design | iOS Human Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Platform focus | Cross-platform, Android-first | iOS, iPadOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS |
| Design philosophy | Material metaphor | Clarity, deference, depth |
| Navigation patterns | Multiple patterns (drawer, bottom, tabs) | Tab bars, navigation bars |
| Typography | Roboto (customizable) | San Francisco, New York |
| Icon style | Outlined, filled | SF Symbols, thin strokes |
| Animation guidelines | Detailed physics-based | Natural, fluid |
| Color system | Dynamic theming, extensive palette | Light/dark modes, system colors |
| Component library | Extensive | Comprehensive |
| Accessibility | Built-in guidelines | Extensive integration |
| Dark mode support | Yes | Yes |
| Design tool support | Figma, Adobe XD, Sketch | Figma, Adobe XD, Sketch |
Material Design: Detailed Analysis
Material Design is Google's design system launched in 2014. It uses tactile, paper-like metaphors combined with bold graphics, intentional white space, and fluid animations to create a visual language that synthesizes classic principles of good design with innovation and technology.
Pros:
✅ Cross-platform consistency across Android, iOS, and web ✅ Extensive documentation with clear implementation guidelines ✅ Flexible and customizable with Material Theming ✅ Large community and widespread adoption ✅ Strong support for accessibility ✅ Comprehensive component library ✅ Regular updates and improvements ✅ Excellent for creating cohesive brand experiences
Cons:
❌ Can feel distinctly "Google" which may clash with iOS user expectations ❌ More complex implementation on iOS platforms ❌ Design updates sometimes create fragmentation ❌ Can be overwhelming for beginners due to extensive guidelines ❌ Sometimes prioritizes aesthetics over usability ❌ Some components don't translate well across all platforms
iOS Human Interface Guidelines: Detailed Analysis
Apple's Human Interface Guidelines (HIG) provide direction for designing interfaces that integrate seamlessly with Apple platforms. The guidelines emphasize clarity, deference to content, and depth through distinct visual layers.
Pros:
✅ Perfect native integration with iOS ecosystem ✅ Creates familiar experiences for iOS users ✅ Streamlined implementation with UIKit and SwiftUI ✅ Excellent accessibility features built into the OS ✅ Consistent updates with each iOS release ✅ SF Symbols provide thousands of consistent, adaptable icons ✅ Automatic support for system features (dark mode, dynamic type) ✅ Clear navigation patterns that iOS users understand intuitively
Cons:
❌ Limited to Apple platforms ❌ Less flexible for custom branding than Material Design ❌ Stricter guidelines with less room for creative interpretation ❌ Can feel too minimal or sparse for some design preferences ❌ Documentation not as extensive as Material Design ❌ Learning curve for designers coming from other platforms ❌ Updates tied to OS releases
Best For (Use Cases)
Material Design is best for:
- Cross-platform applications needing consistent experiences
- Android-first or Android-only applications
- Projects requiring extensive customization while maintaining design system principles
- Teams with designers familiar with Google's ecosystem
- Applications with complex information hierarchies
- Products targeting global audiences with diverse device ecosystems
- Brands looking to create a distinctive UI while leveraging established patterns
iOS Human Interface Guidelines are best for:
- Native iOS, iPadOS, macOS, watchOS, or tvOS applications
- Products focused exclusively on Apple's ecosystem
- Applications where platform-native feel is critical to user acceptance
- Teams with Swift/SwiftUI development expertise
- Products where seamless integration with iOS features is important
- Applications targeting Apple-centric users who expect platform consistency
- Startups wanting to leverage built-in iOS components for faster development
Making Your Decision: Key Considerations
Platform Requirements
Your choice should first consider which platforms you're targeting. If you're building exclusively for iOS, following the Human Interface Guidelines will result in an app that feels natural to iOS users. For cross-platform or Android-focused applications, Material Design offers better consistency.
User Expectations
Consider your users' platform preferences. iOS users have specific expectations about how apps should look and behave, while users across platforms might be more familiar with Material Design patterns from Google's widespread services.
Development Resources
Evaluate your development team's expertise. iOS Human Interface is easier to implement using Swift and SwiftUI, while Material Design has extensive support for web technologies and Android development.
Branding Flexibility
If maintaining strong brand identity through UI is critical, Material Design offers more flexibility through Material Theming. iOS guidelines are more prescriptive about visual presentation.
Design Process
Material Design provides more detailed documentation and design principles, which can be helpful for teams without extensive design resources. iOS guidelines assume more familiarity with fundamental design principles.
The Verdict
Both Material Design and iOS Human Interface Guidelines represent thoughtful, comprehensive approaches to creating usable, accessible, and visually appealing digital products. The "best" choice depends entirely on your specific context.
Choose Material Design if:
- You're building for multiple platforms
- Your application is Android-first or Android-only
- You need extensive flexibility for branding
- You value detailed documentation and guidelines
- Your team is already familiar with Google's ecosystem
Choose iOS Human Interface if:
- You're building exclusively for Apple platforms
- Native iOS feel is critical for your users
- You want to leverage platform-specific features
- Your development team specializes in Swift/SwiftUI
- Your users primarily use Apple devices
Many design teams actually adopt a hybrid approach, following platform-specific guidelines for each operating system while maintaining consistent branding, functionality, and user flows across platforms.
Improve Your UX Design Process with Free Card Sort
Whether you choose Material Design or iOS Human Interface Guidelines, understanding your users' mental models is crucial for creating intuitive information architecture and navigation.
Free Card Sort helps you validate your design system's effectiveness by revealing how users naturally categorize and organize information. This research method works perfectly with both Material Design and iOS Human Interface Guidelines to ensure your implementation matches user expectations.
- Test unlimited cards with unlimited participants
- Analyze results with clear visualizations
- Validate your information architecture
- Improve your navigation structure
- Create more intuitive user experiences
No credit card required, no participant limits, and completely free!