System Usability Scale (SUS) is a quick, standardized questionnaire that measures the perceived usability of a product or system. It provides researchers and designers with a reliable score that indicates how usable and satisfying users find an interface, helping teams identify areas for improvement.
The System Usability Scale (commonly abbreviated as SUS) is a ten-question survey developed by John Brooke in 1986 while working at Digital Equipment Corporation. Despite its age, SUS remains one of the most widely used usability questionnaires in UX research because it's:
SUS has become the industry standard for measuring perceived usability, giving teams a quantifiable way to evaluate and improve user experience.
Implementing the System Usability Scale offers several key benefits:
Most importantly, SUS helps teams measure what matters—the actual user experience—rather than relying solely on assumptions or engagement metrics that don't necessarily reflect usability.
The System Usability Scale consists of 10 alternating positive and negative statements that users rate on a 5-point scale from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree." The statements cover various aspects of usability, including:
Here are the exact 10 statements users respond to:
The scoring process involves:
A score of 68 is considered average. Scores above 80 are excellent, while scores below 50 indicate serious usability problems.
✅ Administer at the right time: Use SUS after participants have had enough interaction with the system to form an opinion, but before a detailed debriefing
✅ Collect qualitative data too: Pair SUS with open-ended questions or interviews to understand the "why" behind the scores
✅ Use consistent timing: For comparative studies, administer SUS at the same point in the user journey
✅ Maintain original wording: Don't modify the questions, as this can affect the reliability of the score
✅ Sample appropriately: Aim for at least 5-8 participants per user group for meaningful results
✅ Set benchmarks: Establish your own baseline scores to track improvements over time
❌ Relying solely on the overall score: Look for patterns in individual question responses for deeper insights
❌ Testing with the wrong users: Make sure participants represent your actual target audience
❌ Administering too early: Don't use SUS before users have had meaningful interaction with the system
❌ Comparing across different types of systems: A score for a mobile app isn't directly comparable to a score for a complex enterprise system
❌ Treating SUS as comprehensive: Remember that SUS measures perceived usability, not actual performance or other aspects of UX
❌ Modifying the questions: Changing the wording invalidates the standardized nature of the test
Card sorting and SUS complement each other well in a comprehensive UX research strategy:
For example, if you receive a low SUS score related to system complexity or feature integration (questions 2 and 5), this might indicate information architecture issues. In this case, you could use card sorting to better understand users' mental models and reorganize your navigation or content structure.
Card sorting helps you build intuitive structures, while SUS helps you measure if those structures actually create a usable experience—making them powerful partners in your UX toolkit.
Ready to implement the System Usability Scale in your research? Begin by establishing a baseline score for your current product, then use it to track improvements over time. Combine SUS with other research methods like card sorting to get a holistic view of your user experience and identify specific areas for enhancement.
Explore related concepts, comparisons, and guides