Affordance refers to the perceived or actual properties of an object that suggest how it can be used. In UX design, affordances are visual cues that help users understand how to interact with elements without explicit instructions.
Affordances are foundational to intuitive design. When users encounter an interface, they need to quickly understand what actions are possible without extensive trial and error. Well-designed affordances:
When digital interfaces have clear affordances, users can focus on their goals rather than figuring out how to use your product.
In digital design, we primarily work with perceived affordances since screen elements don't have physical properties.
These terms are often confused but represent distinct concepts:
| Affordance | Signifier |
|---|---|
| The action possibility itself | The indicator that communicates the affordance |
| What can be done | What shows it can be done |
| Often invisible | Deliberately visible |
Don Norman, who popularized both terms, explains that signifiers are the perceivable aspects that indicate affordances. For example, a button's raised appearance (signifier) indicates it can be pressed (affordance).
✅ Use shadows, highlights, and contrast to make interactive elements stand out ✅ Maintain consistency in how similar elements behave throughout your interface ✅ Follow established conventions when appropriate (e.g., shopping cart icons) ✅ Use hover states to reinforce clickable elements ✅ Implement appropriate cursor changes (pointer for links, etc.)
✅ Consider the user's mental model and expectations ✅ Provide stronger affordances for primary actions ✅ Use motion and animation judiciously to highlight interactive elements ✅ Test your affordances with real users from your target audience ✅ Ensure affordances work across different devices and contexts
❌ False affordances: Elements that look interactive but aren't (e.g., underlined text that isn't a link) ❌ Hidden affordances: Interactive elements with no visual cues indicating they're actionable ❌ Conflicting affordances: Elements that suggest multiple incompatible actions ❌ Broken conventions: Using standard patterns in non-standard ways ❌ Overdesigned elements: When visual styling obscures functional purpose
Card sorting can help evaluate if your interface elements effectively communicate their purpose:
This modified card sorting approach can reveal whether your design's perceived affordances align with your intentions. When participants consistently misinterpret your UI elements, it signals that your affordances need refinement.
To create interfaces with stronger, more intuitive affordances:
Remember that good affordances become invisible to users—they simply know what to do without thinking about it.
Want to test if your interface elements effectively communicate their purpose? Try running a card sorting study to uncover how users perceive your design's affordances and identify opportunities for improvement.